logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2015.07.16 2015고단107
도로교통법위반(무면허운전)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 13, 2014, at around 03:10 on December 13, 2014, the Defendant driven a DNA car without obtaining a driver's license in front of the C hotel located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seocheon-gu.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the occurrence status of E traffic accidents;

1. Entry of the traffic accident report;

1. Entry in the register of driver's licenses;

1. Statement and image of the actual condition survey report;

1. Application of each video statute of a pharmacological map and field photograph;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal facts and Articles 152 subparagraph 1 and 43 of the Road Traffic Act, which choose the penalty;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The following circumstances shall be considered in light of the reasons for sentencing);

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Code of Probation and Order to Attend the scene of the crime of this case was that the defendant was punished five times (one time of suspended sentence of imprisonment and four times of fine) due to drinking driving or unlicensed driving, and the defendant committed the crime of this case in the condition of drinking (section 24 of investigation record) by neglecting the defective vehicle while driving under a license without permission and damaging at the lower part of the parking lot columns of the telecom building, and the victim left the site without leaving the site; the damaged part of the traffic accident is not agreed with or does not recover from the police; the defendant did not have any history of punishment for the same crime since 2010; the defendant was not aware of the crime; the defendant was against the defendant's age, character and behavior, and environment, and other various conditions shown in the arguments of this case, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior.

arrow