logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.08.18 2016가합52766
재택대기발령통지무효확인
Text

1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On July 8, 2015, the Plaintiff entered into a contract with the Defendant to employ the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant employment contract”) with the following content:

(1) In the following, “A” and “B” refer to each of the plaintiffs, respectively, to Article 1 (1) of the Employment Contract. The duties of “B” and “B” are “B” and the class is “the vice president.”

(2) If necessary, A may change the tasks and positions of B, and B shall follow the instructions of B.

A may determine a specific sector comprehensively or by unit work in designating the contents of business.

Article 2(1) Contract Terms are effective from July 8, 2015 to July 7, 2016, and in the event that there are grounds for dismissal under the Rules of Employment and other provisions of Section A and relevant Acts and subordinate statutes for Section B after the contract, Section B may be dismissed by prior notice for Section B 30 days prior to the contract. In such case, this contract shall be terminated.

(2) The notice of the extension of employment shall be given 30 days before the expiration of the contract period, and the existing employment contract shall, in principle, be terminated if there is no notice of the extension of employment.

(hereinafter omitted)

B. On March 22, 2016, the Defendant notified the Plaintiff of the instant standby order (hereinafter “instant standby order”) from March 22, 2016 to the time of separate notification on the ground that the Plaintiff committed the following misconduct. A.

We abuse the authority of the vice president to purchase by certain persons related to you in the course of selling land for young 1 and kindergarten 1 during the course of the investigation requested by us to the Incheon Urban Corporation, thereby hindering fair competition.

(b) Other sexual harassment against female employees at various places, such as a series of jobs;

(c) The fact that the production price in the production of Brazil was temporarily adjusted, and monetary damage was inflicted on the company;

(d) proposing the establishment of C to an overseas investment company without the approval of the company (based on recognition), Gap evidence 1, 19, and Eul.

arrow