1. The part of the judgment below regarding the defendant's case shall be reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

80 hours per the defendant.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. 1) The sentence (five years of imprisonment, and 80 hours of completion of sexual assault treatment programs) imposed by the lower court (hereinafter “Defendant”) against the Defendant and the person subject to a request to attach an attachment order (hereinafter “Defendant”) is too unreasonable. 2) The sentence that the lower court rendered by the Prosecutor is too unfasible and unfair, and is thus unfair, and is also ordered to disclose and notify personal information.

B. It is improper for the lower court to dismiss the request for attachment order of an electronic tracking device against the request for attachment order of an electronic device.

2. Determination

A. The crime of this case against the allegation of unfair sentencing against the first defendant and the prosecutor of the defendant's judgment on the defendant's case is highly likely to be subject to criticism about the behavior of the defendant, the crime of this case was committed on the grounds that the defendant committed several occasions by forcing the victims to feel her son E and H's chests, inserting her fingers into the quality of her fingers, and the victim H suffered bodily harm on the victim's head and left her starboards due to the victim H's not being able to properly follow her horses, and the crime was serious or serious, and the defendant committed an indecent act against the victims for a long time, and because it is difficult for the victims to commit an indecent act against the growthed father, the victim was committed against the victim's sexual humiliation, etc., and the victim seems to have been subject to sexual humiliation, etc., and the victim's children seems to have been divorced by the victim's report of the crime of divorce for a long time thereafter.

Along with the fact that the defendant could not have been injured if he had his wife well, he could not have been injured, and that his psychological status is more deep, etc., which are disadvantageous to the defendant.

On the other hand, the defendant recognized all of the crimes of this case, submitted a statement of reflection several times, and divided his mistake, and even if so, the defendant will proceed to sexual intercourse beyond the degree of indecent act.