The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s imprisonment (one year and two months of imprisonment, confiscation, and collection) is too unreasonable.

2. The fact that the defendant was aware of the crime of this case and his mistake is divided is favorable to the defendant.

However, the court below seems to have determined a punishment by fully considering the circumstances favorable to the defendant, and there seems to be no change of circumstances that would be different from the judgment of the court below, commercial sex acts do not have a significant social hazard, such as harming the sound sexual culture and good morals by commercializing women's sex, and require severe punishment in order to prevent the spread of illegal sex trafficking businesses and to establish a sound sexual culture, and the defendant has the history of having been punished several times for the same sex offenses, and the crime of this case was committed for a long period exceeding 2 years, and the crime of this case was committed for a long time after the crime of this case was controlled by the police, and the defendant repeats commercial sex acts at the same place after the enforcement of the police, and other various sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments, such as the defendant's age-oriented environment, the circumstances before and after the crime, etc., it cannot be deemed that the punishment against the defendant is too unfair.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

(Provided, That in the application of the law of the lower judgment, the term “the pertinent provision of the Act on the 1. Criminal Facts” shall be corrected as “the pertinent provision of the Act and the choice of punishment for the criminal facts”