logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2017.05.10 2017고단139
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 16, 2016, the Defendant, “2017 Godan 139, the Defendant, using a mobile phone at around 00:13, the Defendant’s dwelling located in the Donsan-si, Donsan-do, North Korea, was connected to the Internet game “(s) Mab” by using a mobile phone at around 00:13, 2016, and then sold all Mab Account F to the Victim E despite the Defendant’s intention or ability to sell all

“Falsely speaking, and its affiliated members received KRW 80,00 from the injured party’s account (G) via the Defendant’s Nong Bank account, and received KRW 2,28,000 from the victims 15 times in total from that time until February 7, 2017, as indicated in the list of crimes in the attached Table of Crimes, from that time.

Accordingly, the defendant deceivings victims and received property.

On December 20, 2016, the Defendant posted a letter to the effect that “The Government shall sell Grand gift certificates to KRW 90,000,000,000,000” by accessing a mobile phone at a non-permanent place to a high-speed and high-speed country car page on the Internet, and made a false statement to the effect that the Defendant would sell the gift certificates to the victim H who sent a mobile phone text message.

However, in fact, the defendant did not have a Grand gift certificate, and was thought to be used for the purpose of living expenses when he received money from the injured party, and did not have the intent or ability to sell the gift certificate to the injured party.

Nevertheless, the Defendant had made such a false statement and transferred KRW 90,000 to the Korean bank account with the name of the Defendant on the same day from the injured party.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's oral statement "2017 Highest 139";

1. Each statement of E, I, J, K, L, M, N,O, C, P, Q, R, and S;

1. The A mobile phone will include the details of each account transaction, the details of each account entry and withdrawal transaction, the files of inquiries into each page of each message to cover each page, the certificates of each transfer, a written confirmation of service use, an application for account entry, and the details of each account.

arrow