logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2019.10.23 2019가단9289
전세보증금반환
Text

1. The defendant's delivery of Kimhae-si C Apartment D from the plaintiff at the same time, and at the same time, KRW 105,00,000 to the plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On March 10, 201, the Plaintiff: (a) leased the 105,000,000,000 deposit from the Defendant Kimhae-si apartment D (hereinafter “instant apartment”); and (b) paid the deposit to the Defendant; and (c) has resided in the instant apartment.

B. On April 29, 2019, the Plaintiff notified the Defendant of the termination of the lease agreement.

【Reason for Recognition】 Each entry of evidence Nos. 1 through 3, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the above facts of recognition, a lease agreement between the Plaintiff and the Defendant on the instant apartment pursuant to Article 6-2(2) of the Housing Lease Protection Act was terminated on July 30, 2019 after three months have elapsed since the date on which the Plaintiff was notified of termination of the contract. As such, the Defendant is obliged to return the deposit amount of KRW 105,00,000 to the Plaintiff simultaneously with the delivery of the instant apartment from the Plaintiff.

3. The plaintiff's claim for conclusion is justified and accepted.

arrow