The defendant shall be innocent.

The summary of the facts charged of this case is that "the employee of the defendant violated the restriction on vehicle operation at the Gun's business office located 10 km away from the direction of the new highway on January 9, 2006 concerning the defendant's business."

However, Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4545, Mar. 10, 193; Act No. 4920, Jan. 5, 1995); Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920, Jan. 5, 1995; Act No. 7832, Dec. 30, 2005); Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 7832, Dec. 30, 2005; Act No. 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 8976, Mar. 21, 2008); Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 8976, Mar. 24, 2011; Act No. 4920, Jan. 14, 2010; Act No. 8537, Mar. 4, 2007>