beta
Text
1. The successors of the Defendant A and the Defendant Hyundai Cargo Insurance Co., Ltd. shall jointly participate in the succession.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiff is an insurer who has entered into an automobile insurance contract with respect to BE vehicle (hereinafter “Plaintiff”), and the Defendant A is the owner of C Costaex vehicle (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”), and the Defendant Hyundai C&C Motor Vehicle Insurance Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Hyundai C&C”) is the insurer who entered into an automobile insurance contract with the Defendant with respect to the Defendant vehicle.
B. On November 28, 2012, around 21:30, Defendant A: (a) an accident that conflicts with the Plaintiff’s vehicle that was driven by F at a speed in the speed of speed on the side of the sub-high school from the sub-high school while driving the Defendant’s vehicle from the sub-high school at a speed of speed in the city speed from the sub-high school (hereinafter “instant traffic accident”).
C. On November 29, 2012, F was hospitalized in the Katol University’s governmental organ transplant hospital, and was performed brain recovery surgery on Apr. 4, 2013.
The Plaintiff paid KRW 16,485,980 to F for the above hospital treatment costs. On May 31, 2013, the Plaintiff agreed with F for all of the remaining damages, such as lost earnings, consolation money, and future treatment costs, and paid KRW 10,00,00 for the total amount of KRW 1,421,510 for the loss of disability (=the total amount of loss of 5,600 for the future treatment costs of KRW 6,962,610 for the future treatment costs of KRW 3,756,075 for the future sex treatment costs of KRW 1,40,00 for the future sex treatment costs of KRW 1,40,00 for the future sex treatment costs of KRW 4,945,790 for the treatment costs of the previous treatment costs of KRW 4,795,790 for the treatment costs of the previous treatment costs of KRW 1,756,00 for the future,00 for the treatment costs of the previous treatment costs of the forest).
E. Meanwhile, on the other hand, on May 27, 2015, the succeeding intervenor filed an application for intervention on July 9, 2015 on the ground that he/she succeeded to the status of insurer under an insurance contract pursuant to Article 146(1) of the Insurance Business Act, on the ground that he/she succeeded to the status of insurer under an insurance contract.