All appeals by the Defendants and the Prosecutor are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Each sentence sentenced by the lower court to the Defendants (a fine of five million won) is too unreasonable.

B. The above punishment, which the court below decided against the Defendants, is too unhued and unfair.

2. We examine the defendants and prosecutor's unfair arguments of sentencing together with each of the following facts: the defendants' age, gender, environment, family relationship, etc.; the business period of the instant sexual traffic business establishment is relatively short; the defendant A is a first offender without any previous conviction; the defendant A is a first offender without the same criminal records; the defendant Eul's act of arranging sexual traffic is not likely to be detrimental to society; thus, it is necessary to be strict; the defendant A committed the instant crime by employing Russian women; the defendant Eul committed the instant crime by employing Russian women; the defendant B committed the instant crime without being aware of it even though he was a repeated offense period; and other unfavorable circumstances such as the defendants' age, sex, environment, family relation, and circumstances after the instant crime; and considering all of the sentencing conditions stated in the records of this case, it is not recognized that each of the punishment imposed by the court below is too heavy or unfair, and the defendants and prosecutor's arguments are without merit.

3. In conclusion, since both the defendants and the prosecutor's appeal is clearly groundless, all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (5) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and it is so decided as per Disposition.