Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. Forgery of private documents;

A. On March 26, 2011, the Defendant confirmed that the Defendant borrowed KRW 2 million in cash as the title “written notice of cash in blank” with a tampial with a tample at a place where it is difficult to identify the place.

The address of the above officer: Ulsan-gu

C. Name: D: B. On April 20, 201, the Defendant confirmed that the Defendant borrowed KRW 2,00,000 in cash in a blank with a tampial with a tample at a place where the location cannot be known.

The address of the above officer: Ulsan-gu

C. Name: “D.” (c) On September 8, 201, the Defendant confirmed that the Defendant borrowed KRW 2 million in cash as the title “written notice of cash payment” in blank with a tample at a place where the location cannot be known at the time of September 8, 201.

The address of the above officer: Ulsan-gu

C. Name: D. The phrase “D.”

Accordingly, the defendant, without authority, forged three copies of the cash paper, which is a private document on the rights and obligations of the victim D, respectively.

2. Uttering of the relevant investigation document and attempted fraud;

A. On July 10, 2012, the Defendant submitted three copies of a forged cash paper to the public official in charge who was unaware of the forgery at the Ulsan District Court’s civil petition office located in Ulsan-dong, Ulsan-gu, Seoul-do, and exercised it.

B. The Defendant filed a lawsuit claiming a loan amounting to KRW 6 million (Ulsan District Court 2012Da52079, Ulsan District Court 2012) against the victim D, accompanied by three copies of a forged cash misappropriation as mentioned above, at the same time and at the same place.

However, the facts are that the defendant did not lend 6 million won to the victim, and all of 3 copies of the above cash paper were forged as seen earlier.

As above, while the Defendant tried to acquire pecuniary benefits from the victim by deceiving the above court division and rendering a favorable judgment, the Defendant did not have the intent but failed to commit an attempted crime in a final and conclusive judgment of loss in the above civil procedure.

Summary of Evidence

1. Part of the defendant;