1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. The grounds for appeal by the plaintiff citing the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the allegations in the court of first instance, and the fact-finding and judgment of the court of first instance are recognized as legitimate even if the evidence submitted in this case

Therefore, the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is partly dismissed as set forth in the following Paragraph 2, and it is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance except for adding the judgment of the plaintiff to the allegations added by this court as set forth in Paragraph 3 below. Thus, it is acceptable in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the height of the first instance is “B” (hereinafter referred to as “instant land”) in the first instance part of the third part (hereinafter referred to as “instant land”), “B” (hereinafter referred to as “instant land” in total of the above land and each of the above shares).

Each "this Court" in the 3rd and 14th and the 3rd and 14th and each "the court of first instance" is "the court of first instance."

The 4th parallel 18 to 20th parallel are as follows:

The evidence submitted by the Plaintiff alone constitutes an unlawful cause in the method of evaluating the court’s appraisal of the instant land.

It is insufficient to recognize that there is a special error in the assessment contents, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

Furthermore, in full view of the evidence and the purport of the entire pleadings adopted earlier, since the result of the court appraisal among the results of each appraisal of the land of this case appears to have properly taken into account the specific use area, the current status of use, and individual factors, it is reasonable to calculate the amount of compensation for the Plaintiff’s land

The 5th to 6th, the plaintiff does not explicitly state that the court's appraisal is unfair.

by striking ''.

3. Judgment on the Plaintiff’s assertion added by this court

A. The court’s appraisal of the land of this case as to the gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion is unreasonable for the following reasons.

1. The instant land.