Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who has been driving a motor vehicle from Chump. for business purposes.

On April 6, 2016, the Defendant driven the road in front of the Enice area D located in Cheongju-si, a considerable area of Cheongju-si, and led the Defendant to drive the vehicle in front of the above Anice area at the elementary school of the Dongju to drive the vehicle in one lane among the two lanes. In such a case, the Defendant had a duty of care to properly examine the front section and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and accurately manipulate the steering and prevent the accident from occurring due to the failure of the accident.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and operated the F, which was prior to the same lane due to negligence in the course of the accident.

G The back portion of the G-si was received in front of the passenger car in the foregoing A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-U

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim H (V, 73 years of age) who was on board the said taxi due to the foregoing occupational negligence, such as a pleasting 10, 11, which requires approximately 12 weeks medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A written statement of F and I;

1. A survey report on actual conditions;

1. According to each of the above evidence, the medical certificate of diagnosis (the traffic accident in this case was somewhat minor, and the fact that an elderly victim was receiving medical treatment due to the pelvisa marism at the time is recognized.

However, in light of all circumstances acknowledged by each of the above evidence, such as the fact that there is no particular material to prove that there was an alley on the part of the injured person before the accident, the fact that F, a taxi driver after the accident, reported to the police to the police, and the victim received medical treatment at the hospital immediately after the accident, it is sufficiently recognized as the victim's injury and the person with the traffic accident of this case, regardless of how much the spath of the victim caused the expansion of damage.

Application of Statutes

1. Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Article 268(1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts (excluding punishment).