logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원고양지원 2020.10.28 2020가단9049
제3자이의
Text

1. The Defendant’s payment order with executory power in the Daejeon District Court Branch of Daejeon District Court Decision 2019j144 against C.

Reasons

1. On November 4, 2019, the Defendant, indicating the claim, seized C C’s corporeal movables listed in the attached seizure list D by means of an executory payment order in the Daejeon District Court Branch Decision 2019j144 case, which was executed on November 4, 2019. However, on March 7, 2019, the Plaintiff already purchased and owns C’s corporeal movables on the date of auction for corporeal movables (F of the Gohap District Court Decision 2010) (hereinafter “instant movables”).

Therefore, the seizure of the Defendant’s movable property of this case should be denied because it is against the third party, the Plaintiff’s property.

2. Judgment without holding any pleadings (Articles 208 (3) 1 and 257 of the Civil Procedure Act);

arrow