1. Revocation of a judgment of the first instance;

2. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

3. All costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Determination as to the legitimacy of the subsequent appeal of this case

(a) The facts subsequent to the facts of recognition may be recognized if it is apparent in the records or if it is added to the entries in Eul evidence 5 (including paper numbers) by adding to the whole purport of the pleadings:

1) The plaintiff filed the lawsuit against the defendant on March 23, 2009. The court of the first instance ordered the defendant to serve the copy of the complaint of this case on March 26, 2009, Kimhae-si, the defendant's domicile, 1, the defendant's absence on April 1, 2009, 2, the execution officer was served on April 28, 2009, 2, the recipient was unknown on May 6, 2009, 3, the execution officer again served on June 2, 2009, but the delivery was impossible on June 5, 2009, and the delivery was ordered on July 31, 2009 to serve the defendant by public notice, and the plaintiff's judgment on September 23, 2009, which became final and conclusive on September 14, 2009, which became final and conclusive on September 23, 2009.

On the same day, the Defendant came to know of the fact that the judgment of the first instance court was served by service by public notice in the process of issuing the instant claim seizure and collection order by sending the contact that the instant claim seizure and collection order was served by the Nonghyup Bank. On November 3, 2014, the Defendant submitted the instant written appeal for subsequent completion to the court of first instance.

B. If the copy, original copy, etc. of a copy of the board was served by public notice, it shall be served by public notice.