logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.09.17 2018노3862
사기
Text

The judgment of the court below is reversed.

The defendant is written at 1 to 3 times a year of sight of the crime of the 2018 Highest 608 Incident as the judgment of the court below.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (each of the crimes listed in subparagraphs 1 through 3 of the List of Offenses in the 2018 Highest 608 Highest 608 Highest 1607 Highest 1607 Highest : Imprisonment with prison labor for two months, each of the crimes listed in subparagraphs 4 through 64 in the List of Offenses in the 2018 Highest 608 Highest 608 Highest 2018 Highest 607 Highest 1607 Highest 3: Imprisonment with labor for ten months) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below committed each of the crimes in this case during the period immediately after the defendant was sentenced to the suspended sentence of imprisonment with prison labor for the same crime or during the suspended sentence. The majority of the victims and the total amount of defraudation are not many, etc. However, although there are circumstances unfavorable to the defendant, it appears that the defendant seriously divided his/her mistake, such as preparing and sending a letter of request to victims, etc. On the other hand, the victim M, BJ and CO were additionally taken measures to recover damage to victims and recover most of the damage amount by taking measures to recover damage, and agreed with the victims, each of the crimes listed in the daily list Nos. 1 through 3 of the 2018 Highest 608 Highest 1 and 2 of the 2018 Highest 1 and 2 of the 2018 Highest 1 and the 1607 Highest 2 of the judgment, it is recognized that the defendant's age favorable to the defendant, age, character, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc.

The defendant's argument of sentencing is justified.

3. As the appeal by the defendant is well-grounded, the judgment of the court below is reversed in accordance with Article 364(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the appeal by the defendant is again decided as follows.

[Re-written judgment] The summary of facts constituting an offense and evidence recognized by the court is the same as that of each corresponding column of the judgment below.

arrow