The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. In light of the gist of the grounds for appeal by the Defendant (unfair form of punishment) (unfair form of punishment) and the fact that the Defendant’s mistake is recognized, and the total amount of real estate values concealed in the name of G is merely KRW 7,939,050, and efforts are made to recover damage, the sentence of the lower court that sentenced five months of imprisonment is too unreasonable.

2. The crime of this case is committed in order for the defendant to be exempted from compulsory execution, and the nature of the crime is not good, and the damage recovery is not performed until the trial is the first instance. The defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years in the Seoul Eastern District Court on January 20, 2006 due to the crime of violation of the Punishment of Violence, etc. Act (at night joint intimidation) at the Seoul East Eastern District Court on January 20, 2006, and there are several records of criminal punishment. Considering the motive and background of the crime of this case, the circumstances before and after the crime of this case, the degree of damage, and other various matters stipulated in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, which are conditions for sentencing, such as the defendant's character and behavior, and the environment, even if considering the circumstances alleged in the grounds for appeal, the above assertion is too unreasonable. Thus, the above assertion is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.