logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2014.08.28 2014고단777
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who operates a B B B B-L cruise car.

On September 21, 2013, at around 05:45, the Defendant driven the said car under the influence of alcohol by at least 0.118% of alcohol concentration on the front of the post office in front of the dispatching post office located in the same Ri on the same day in the vicinity of the office of Songcheon-si, Macheon-do.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. C police statement;

1. Report on the state of a driving under the influence of alcohol, and inquiry into the results of the control of drinking driving;

1. Each investigation report (the report of the police officer in charge of the call of the police officer at the first scene / the draft of the police box, the proxy engineer, and the D telephone communications report / the report of the results of measurement of the blood alcohol concentration of the suspect who sited on the Bamark

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on the 112 Reporting Case Handling Table;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on the Crime and Articles 148-2 (2) 2 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, which choose the penalty for the crime;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, despite the testimony and objective circumstances of witnesses and enforcement officers, following the crime, such as intending to deny or abolish the crime, such as “dacting after driving” by the police and the prosecutor’s office until the end of the crime. The prosecution prosecutor claimed a summary order of KRW 4 million, but submitted it to the trial.

It shall be considered in favor of the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant does not have any previous error, the fact that the defendant led to a crime in this court, led to the cancellation of a driver's license in his occupation, and that the defendant appeared against him.

In addition, on the basis of the sentencing precedent of the same case as that of the prosecutor's old-age (a fine of four million won) and the sentencing precedent of the same case, the sentence shall be determined as ordered in full view of various circumstances, which are the conditions of sentencing

arrow