logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.10.21 2014고정2355
사기등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

From June 201, the Defendant became aware of the victim C who was found to be in a de facto marital relationship with B and B, while running the marriage brokerage business around June 201.

1. The Defendant plans to operate B and sexual traffic establishments around June 2012, and, in order to raise operating funds, the Defendant was willing to suggest that the victim would run a traditional marina shop business in China as if it had been operated.

On June 22, 2012, the Defendant stated, “In the front of Gwanak-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Seoul Special Metropolitan City D, the victim was at the location where the land was used to store Chinese traditional marina in the 4th floor of Gwanak-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City D, and the deposit amount of KRW 20 million is KRW 35 million and the monthly rent of KRW 1.2 million is KRW 1.2 million, and first, the Defendant invested half of the deposit and the premium (27.5 million) and carried on a business together.”

However, in fact, the defendant was thought to operate illegal sexual traffic businesses, and even if the terms and conditions of the lease contract were to be paid to the victim amounting to KRW 25 million in premium and KRW 1.2 million in monthly rent, it was intended to use some of them for the repayment of loans, etc.

Nevertheless, the Defendant received cash of KRW 10,000,000 as a security deposit in the Defendant’s vehicle that was parked in the vicinity of Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on the same day from the victim, and received KRW 90,000,000 as a security deposit on July 6, 2012, under the name of KRW 17,50,000 and brokerage commission, respectively.

Accordingly, the Defendant, as seen above, received a total of KRW 28.4 million from the victim by deceiving the victim.

2. The Defendant violated the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. (the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc.) is operating a commercial sex trafficking business with B, using the funds borrowed from C as operating funds, such as the funds borrowed from D 4 from around July 7, 2012, Seoul Special Metropolitan City D.

On March 27, 2013, the Defendant is at the superior business establishment around 14:30.

arrow