1. The Defendant shall pay KRW 5,363,820 to the Plaintiff the annual rate of KRW 15% from December 9, 2016 to the date of complete payment.

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Business authorization and public notice - B access road expansion construction (hereinafter “instant project”) - C public notice of the following regional land management authority on September 26, 2014

B. In the adjudication of expropriation made by the Central Land Expropriation Committee on August 20, 2015, the portion of the compensation for farming loss - The compensation for farming loss - The compensation for farming loss - The date of expropriation on the ground of the instant land, which was due to the expropriation of the land of 124m3,359m2 (hereinafter referred to as “instant land”): The date of expropriation - The compensation for farming loss - the amount of compensation for farming loss - the amount of KRW 19,678,950 on October 13, 2015 - the central appraisal corporation, the stock company, and the future appraisal corporation (hereinafter referred to as “adjudication corporation”).

C. The Defendant’s foregoing September 25, 2015

19,678,950 won, based on the ruling of acceptance of the paragraph, was deposited as the Gunsan Branch of the Jeonju District Court in the year 2015.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 3, Eul evidence 1, 2, and 10 (including branch numbers), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The evidence of the standard for the recognition of actual income from agricultural crops under Article 4 of the Public Notice of the Ministry of Construction and Transportation, enacted pursuant to delegation of Article 48(2) of the Enforcement Rule of the Act on Acquisition of and Compensation for Land, etc. for the Plaintiff’s Claim Public Works Projects (hereinafter “Land Compensation Act”), is an example of evidence of objectivity and rationality. As such, the evidence of the standard for the recognition of actual income from agricultural crops under Article 2013-401 of the Public Notice of the Ministry of Construction and Transportation, enacted pursuant to delegation of Article 48(2) of the Enforcement Rule of the Act on Acquisition of and Compensation for Land, etc. for Land, etc. for Public Works Projects for the Plaintiff, is merely an example of evidence of objectivity and rationality. As such, the fact that the Plaintiff submitted a transaction statement prepared by the F producer Cooperatives, G-Friendly Agricultural Partnership Corporation, H agricultural partnership Corporation, I agricultural partnership corporation, and the Agricultural Partnership Corporation J, and the account transaction

The plaintiff's annual basis is only the data submitted by the plaintiff.