The defendant shall be innocent.

1. On January 27, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 16:00 to around 17:00, and around 17:00, left knee knee knee knee kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee

2. Determination

A. Comprehensively taking into account the witness G and H’s respective legal statements, the statement of the police statement of H on the police statement of H, the diagnosis statement, the pictures of the instant site and the images of CDs, etc., the following facts may be acknowledged:

1) Around 10:00 on the day of the instant case, H moved F to F at around 14:00, and moved to F at around 16:00, and went to F at around 16:00.

2) The Defendant is a language clinic working in E, and is proceeding with F from 16:00 to 16:45 of the same day with respect to language therapy for the same day, and thereafter, took part in parents counseling with H for about 5 to 10 minutes, and thereafter H took part in F.

3) During the period H’s return to F and her house, H heard the word “F” that the bridge she would face. He asked why why is why the bridge she would face, thereby hearing the word “B” from F.

4) H가 F을 집에 데려 다 준 다음 G은 F의 오른쪽 무릎 앞부분이 빨갛게 부어 있는 것을 확인하였다.

5) F은 G에게 선생님이 발로 찼다는 취지로 말을 하였고 (I 유치원의 J 선생님을 지칭한 것으로 보인다), 이에 G은 I 유치원에 전화하여 이를 문의하였으나 그런 사실이 없다는 답변을 듣게 되었다.

6) Since then G asked F to what kind of her life had been inflicted on G, and that it had F listen to the speech therapy room’s words.

Accordingly, H made a phone call to the Defendant to the effect that “The Defendant did not have any fact at the time of the Defendant F, but F was knee F with the Defendant’s knee in the course of class.”