logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2019.12.12 2018나12233
물품대금
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The fact that there is no dispute over the cause of the claim, and if the purport of the entire pleadings is added to each of the statements in Gap evidence Nos. 2 through 4 (including a provisional number; hereinafter the same shall apply), the plaintiff may recognize the fact that the plaintiff supplied the defendant with the goods, such as the kind of full-time and full-time seed species (hereinafter referred to as "the goods of this case") equivalent to KRW 6,152,00 from October 23, 2015 to December 22, 2015, and the defendant is liable to pay the plaintiff the price of the goods of this case 6,152,000 won and damages for delay, unless there are any special circumstances.

2. Judgment as to the defendant's claim for offset

A. The gist of the Defendant’s assertion was that part of the two-wave species supplied by the Defendant from the Plaintiff, which was not a full-time life species, and that result in damage equivalent to KRW 16,537,500 or KRW 15,512,175 to the Defendant due to the decrease in a full-frequency yield. Accordingly, the Defendant’s claim for damages should be offset against the Defendant’s automatic claim.

In other words, the Defendant: (a) listened to the Plaintiff’s talk that the two-wave sected sected sected sected sponsed sponsed sponsed sponsed sponsed sponsed spons spons spons spons spons spons spons spons spons spons spons spons spons spons spons spons spons spons spons spons spons spons spons spons spons spons spons spons spons spons spons spons spons spons spons spons s, and (b) on October 2015, 2015.

The 60,000 g = 25 km per square meter x 2.2.

arrow