Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be the day.

Punishment of the crime

At around 12:00 on August 29, 2018, the Defendant damaged the victim’s property by causing KRW 741,585 on the ground that the victim D (W) owned by the victim D (W, 21 years old) parked on the street in front of the entrance of his own entrance, and that the vehicle was parked in front of the entrance.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness D and F;

1. In light of the report on the occurrence of property damage, such as site photographs, etc., 2 copies of written estimates, 2 copies of written estimates, investigation reports (Attachment of photographs of repair progress taken by industrial companies), 8 copies of photograph of damaged vehicle repair process [the defendant and his defense counsel, despite the fact that the defendant gave consent to the victim's vehicle due to his new launch, the victim and the police officer dispatched to the scene at the time clearly stated that there was a defect on the front side of the defendant's engine. However, in light of the material quality of the sloter reported by the defendant at the time, and the details of the victim's acceptance, the charges in the judgment are sufficiently recognized. Accordingly, the defendant and the defense counsel's argument cannot be accepted. In addition, the crime of property damage under Article 366 of the Criminal Act is established in cases where the utility of another person's property is damaged by damage or concealment or by any other means, and the act of causing damage to the victim's original purpose of use of the vehicle can not be provided due to his/her own property or its appraisal (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2007Do6.

1. Article 36 of the Criminal Act and Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the choice of fines, and the selection of fines.