1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of disposition;

A. On August 21, 2014, while the Plaintiff was working as the Director General of Gwangju B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Nonindicted Company”) as the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff was diagnosed as having lost his own consciousness within the workplace, and was diagnosed as “cerebral ties and high blood pressure (hereinafter “the instant injury and disease”).

B. On December 10, 2014, the Plaintiff filed an application for medical care benefits with the Defendant alleging that the instant injury or disease was caused by occupational and stress. Accordingly, on February 4, 2015, the Defendant rejected the application on the ground that it is difficult to deem that the instant injury or disease was caused by occupational or stress.

(hereinafter “instant disposition”). C.

The plaintiff filed a request for review to the defendant, but it was dismissed on July 29, 2015 while the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Reexamination Committee filed a request for reexamination.

【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, Gap Nos. 1 and 2, Eul No. 1 and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The team leader C, who is a subordinate employee of the Plaintiff’s assertion, was willing to frequently control the Plaintiff’s work instruction, and D, which is another team leader, could not have been in mind with C, and for this reason, the Plaintiff was under continuous stress due to the incombustibility with subordinates, such as where the sum between the team leader and the team leader was not elicated, but rather excluded.

In particular, around February 2014, the conflict and conclusion with C requested measures against C to the Secretary-General of the Non-Party Company E to take on the issue of C, but rather, the Plaintiff told C to w at the meeting of the Director-General, and the Plaintiff resisted and excluded the Plaintiff from attending the meeting of the Director-General by the end of excluding the Plaintiff.

After that, around August 10, 2014, C pointed out the Plaintiff’s mistake, flags, and flags, and flags. On the day immediately before the occurrence of the instant case, C became a member of a community water purifier with a period of five years and more.