beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On May 12, 2014, the Defendant entered into a contract to purchase 130-10 of the New Salary-si 130-10 of Sinsan-si, a limited company B Team affiliated with the victim filial Capital Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “D”) for the use in the manufacturing and production process at the factory of the limited company partnership industry, 1 of the Food E (Research F) press in 1996, 200, 1 of the Food G (Research H) press in 200, 1 of the Food I (Research H) press in 202, 1 of the food J (Research K) in 1995, 1 of the container MJ in 1, 1995, 1 of the purchase price, 190 million won.
"A lease agreement was concluded with the victim for the above-mentioned crimes, including the above-mentioned crimes, with the victim."
However, the Defendant had already concluded a factory mortgage agreement with the National Bank of Korea on January 17, 2013, 200, including 1996 Food E (ManufactureF), 200 G (Research H), and 202 Food I (Research H). The Defendant had not concluded a new contract with the National Bank of Korea on July 17, 2013, 1, 200 G (Research H), 1, 202 G I (Research H), and 1, 1, 2002 G (Research H), and thus, the Defendant did not have the capacity to purchase the aforementioned G leases from D companies, and thus, the Defendant would not return the aforementioned funds to the Defendant’s intent to purchase or purchase the funds for the use of the funds for the use of the funds for the use of the funds for the use of the funds for the use of the funds for the use of the new funds for the purchase of the funds for the use of the funds for the use of the funds for the use of the funds for the use of the funds for the use of the funds.
The defendant deceivings the victim as above and transferred 95,200,000 won to one bank account (L) under the name of D on May 15, 2014 from the victim.
Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Statement made by the police against M;
1. Lease Agreements and Redemption Schedule 1.