All appeals filed by the defendant and prosecutor are dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal asserts that the punishment imposed by the court below (eight months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable, and the prosecutor asserts that the punishment imposed by the court below is too uneasible and unreasonable.

2. We examine both parties’ assertion of unfair sentencing.

The fact that the defendant is led to confession and reflect, that the defendant is judged to have no substantial benefit acquired by the crime of this case, that the defendant is in a position to support his wife and young children, and that the defendant made a statement to M, N, and J operated along with the instant speculative game site during the investigation process of this case, and that he was prosecuted as an accomplice for the crime of this case is favorable to the defendant.

However, the crime of this case was committed on February 20, 2012 to March 6, 2012 by the defendant established 40 game machine "D Gameland" on the second floor of the building C in Jinju-si, which was rated as the whole, and provided outside equipment (I/O) for the above game machine so that the defendant can freely convert the contents different from the contents classified by installing an external device (I/O) for the game machine into the game machine, and provided customers with the game software of different contents from those classified by installing an external device (I/O), so that customers can play a game. The case was committed for the illegal game room business to exchange the points obtained through the use of the game product, and the issue is not less than that of the case, the punishment of imprisonment with prison labor for the special case of the illegal game hall business of general public and decreasing their desire to work, etc., and the defendant is punished for 201.2.1.2.2.1.2.2.2.2.2.