The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. On May 14, 2016, the Defendant: (a) entered the “multi-face” located under Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu; (b) 15:00 on May 14, 2016; and (c) obstructed the victim by taking advantage of the victim’s face, referring the victim’s flab, who was an employee, with the words “the competent authority in flab as he was under influence of alcohol,” without any particular reason, she saw the victim as an employee; and (d) she flabed the victim by taking advantage of the victim’s face face; and (e) she flabd the victim’s left face at one time with his/her resistance.

2. Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts charged for judgment: A judgment dismissing a public prosecution on June 20, 2016 that a written agreement stating that the victim C under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act does not want the punishment of the defendant on the following grounds: Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act is submitted (Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act)