The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. After a taxi stops, the Defendant spits or spits the victim with a bath and spit the victim, and there is only a fact that the victim only spits himself/herself to defend himself/herself, and there is no assault against the victim in operation.

Nevertheless, the court below found the defendant guilty of the facts charged in this case by reliance on the statements of the victim with no credibility, and there is an error of law by misunderstanding facts and affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

B. The sentence imposed by the lower court on the grounds that the sentence of unfair sentencing (six months of imprisonment, two years of suspended sentence, 40 hours of an order to attend lectures, and 40 hours of an order to attend violent therapy) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court as to the assertion of mistake of facts, the Defendant’s assertion is without merit, since it is sufficiently recognized that the Defendant committed an assault against the victim, such as the victim’s scam scam scamsing and scamsing the lower part of the taxi in operation as indicated in the judgment of the lower court when the Defendant was seated at the top of the taxi driven by the victim

(i) After committing the instant crime, the victim stated that, from the time when the police was investigated by the lower court to the trial court, the Defendant took a bath against the victim while driving, spit spit spit spit spit spit spit spit spit spit spit spit spit spit spit spit spit spit spit spit spit spit spit spit spit spit spit spit spit spit spit spit spit spit spit, as it is no longer possible for the victim to drive the spit spit s

Although the victim made a statement about the above defendant's behavior and made a partial different statement about the time order, the core of the defendant at the time of the instant case.