(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.03.22 2013고정643

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.03.22 2013고정643

사기등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 12,000,000 won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On June 5, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a crime, etc. at the Seoul Central District Court for the same year.

6. 13. The judgment became final and conclusive.

1. On May 10, 2010, the Defendant concluded that “Around May 10, 2010, at the office of 3rd floor C in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the victim D would have a balance of KRW 50 billion in the internal head of the Tong, and the financial cost would be changed instead of issuing the head of the Tong and the balance certificate so that the apartment purchase business can be promoted.”

However, even if the defendant receives the payment, he did not have any intention or ability to issue a balance certificate with the passbook of 50 billion won.

The defendant deceivings the victim as such and causes the same damage from the victim for financial expenses.

5.11. A delivery of KRW 20 million through C for the same year.

5. 21. The remittance of 10 million won to the deposit account in the name of the defendant, and the same year;

5. 25. The receipt of remittance of 33 million won to the deposit account in the name of the defendant and the same year;

6. 18. The receipt of remittance of 10 million won to the deposit account in the name of the defendant, and the same year;

7. 14. The Defendant received a total of KRW 74 million from the money of KRW 1 million to the deposit account in the name of the Defendant and acquired it by fraud.

2. The defendant who counterfeited a private document shall be punished by the same year;

5. Around 13, in the name of the Defendant’s house, 912.107, Seocheon-si E-si, Seocheon-si, the Defendant, without authority, forged the details of the passbook issued by the NAF, which is a private document for certification of the rights and obligations and the details of the passbook issued by the NAF, by stating “1005.13”, “52,700,010,000” in the remaining amount column, and “the business register” in the transaction column.

3. The defendant who exhibits a falsified document for the same year.

5. Around 13. Around the same day, a copy of the forged passbook was sent to D who is aware of the forgery at the place specified in paragraph 2 of the above Article through a door-to-door as if it were a document duly formed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. C, D.

유사 판례

-서울중앙지방법원 2015.09.16 2014고정976

-의정부지방법원 2014.01.24 2013고단2956

-서울남부지방법원 2014.03.20 2014노133

-인천지방법원 부천지원 2013.05.24 2013고합6

-서울중앙지방법원 2014.11.27 2014고단1847