beta
Text
1. The Plaintiff:
A. Defendant A, B, C, and D shall within the scope of the property inherited from the network H, each of which is KRW 4,99,99,99.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. On July 14, 2006, the Korea Asset Management Corporation was sentenced to a judgment of 20,000,000 won jointly and severally with the Korea Asset Management Corporation, H, J, and I, as well as 5,00,000 won, jointly and severally with the Korea Asset Management Corporation, H and J, etc. as well as 19% interest per annum from October 1, 199 to the date of full payment, and the above judgment became final and conclusive around that time.
B. The Plaintiff acquired from the Korea Asset Management Corporation the claim of KRW 20,00,000 for H, J, and I of the judgment amount stated in the above paragraph (a) above from the Korea Asset Management Corporation and the claim of KRW 1,500,000 for the above 5,00,000 for H, J, and I of the damages for delay, and the damages for delay thereof, and notified H, J, and I of the assignment of the claim as the transferor’s representative.
C. H died on September 18, 2006. He died on September 18, 2006, the J, the husband of H, died on September 29, 2014. Defendant A, B, C, and D were children between H and J, and the said Defendants were adjudicated to accept a report on qualified acceptance in inheritance of the net H’s property.
On October 8, 2011, I died, and as his inheritor, there was Defendant E, F, and G, who is his child, and Defendant E, E, and G received a report of qualified acceptance in inheritance of the network I’s property.
[Ground of Recognition: Facts without dispute, entry of Gap 1-6 evidence (including each number), fact inquiry results on the branch court of the original district court of this court, the purport of the whole pleadings]
2. According to the above facts of determination as to the cause of the claim, as the transferee of the Korea Asset Management Corporation, the Plaintiff filed the lawsuit in this case for the interruption of extinctive prescription, and ① Defendant A, B, C, and D, within the scope of the property inherited from the network H, each of the KRW 4,99,99,99 (the amount the Plaintiff sought within the limit of KRW 1/4 of the inherited portion for KRW 20,000,00) and the above amount, ② Defendant E and G are within the scope of the property inherited from the networkI.