logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 원주지원 2018.07.18 2018고단420
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a motor vehicle B that is in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury resulting from dangerous driving).

On February 18, 2018, the Defendant driven the said car under the influence of alcohol content of 0.191% from blood transfusion around 06:10, while driving the said car, and driving the front road of “D” located in “D” in “C” in “C” in “C” in “C” in the original city, along the two-lanes from the shooting distance room of the original city medical center to the boundary of the Southern market.

At the same time, the F taxi driven by the victim E (66) was stopped for the signal waiting at that time. In such a case, the driver of the vehicle had a duty of care to prevent the accident in advance by properly manipulating the brake system in accordance with the progress of the vehicle in front, through thorough operation of the operation of the vehicle in front.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected to drive normally due to influence of drinking, and was negligent in not operating the brake system at all times, and received the back part of the above taxi from the Defendant as the front part of the passenger car.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered, by the above occupational negligence, the injury to the victim E, such as finite finites, etc. requiring approximately three weeks of medical treatment, injury to the victim G (the 14th, the 14th, the 14th, the 14th, the 14th, the I (the 14th, the finites), and the J (the fin, the 14th, the finites, the finites, the finites, and the finites, the finites of which

2. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking) Defendant 1 driven a sprink in the state of alcohol alcohol concentration of approximately 0.191% at the section of approximately 2 km from the road front of the Saemaeul restaurant located in the original city level, to the place of the said accident.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. E statements;

1. On-site medication, a survey report on actual conditions, field photographs, notification of the results of the control of drinking driving, and application of each medical certificate to statutes;

1. Criminal facts;

arrow