logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.04.21 2015고단3728
업무상배임
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

From April 5, 199 to October 16, 2019, the Defendant worked in the victim D (hereinafter “victim”) (hereinafter “victim”) (hereinafter “the Plaintiff”) who is a company manufacturing the horses from around April 5, 1999 to around October 16, 2013. From around December 2, 2002, the Defendant was working in the Ministry of Environment as the Deputy Director of the Ministry of Environment for the Quality Control of the horses, and was working in the Ministry of Strategy and Finance for the damaged company’s preparation (hereinafter “the instant drawing”). The Defendant was in the course of performing the foregoing work without permission to divulge the damaged company’s trade secrets or major assets without permission, or used documents containing trade secrets for any purpose other than the business or to take them out of the Republic of Korea.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, while working in the victimized Company, copied and copied the Chapter 425 of the instant design drawings, which are managed as principal business assets of the victimized Company, and personally kept them. From December 1, 2013, the date of withdrawal from the victimized Company, the Defendant, as a competitor of the victimized Company in Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, entered the company as a director of technology and entered the company as a competitor of the victimized Company, and had the company carry out the business of producing and managing brine and AS, the Defendant acquired (K270-450D4E -H-270)’s “SW-270” in the instant design drawings using “K20-450D3E -H” and “the amount of 370 MH-40” in the instant design drawings using “the amount of 270 MW-320” and “the amount of 370 MW-40” in the instant design drawings.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's person;

arrow