1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant A is the building listed in the attached Table 1 list;

B. Defendant B shall be the building listed in the attached Table 3 list, C.

In full view of the purport of each statement in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3, the defendants may terminate the contract immediately in the event that the plaintiff leases each of the pertinent real estate among the real estate listed in the separate sheet from the plaintiff and does not pay rent to the plaintiff for more than three consecutive months. In the event that the lease contract is terminated, the lessee entered into each lease contract to restore the above real estate to the lessor and return it to the lessor. The defendants are found to have defaulted in paying rent for more than three months as shown in the separate sheet as of June 14, 2015. The defendants asserted that the lease contract of this case was terminated on the ground that the plaintiff asserted that the lease contract of this case was terminated and sought delivery of the real estate possessed by

In light of the above facts, each lease contract concluded between the plaintiff and the defendants was lawfully terminated by being served on each of the defendants by the complaint of this case stating the purport of seeking the termination of the lease contract on the grounds of overdue rent. Thus, the defendants are obligated to deliver each of the relevant real estate listed in the separate sheet of each lease contract to the plaintiff.

Thus, the claim of this case is accepted on the ground of the reasons.