Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 22, 2017, the Defendant committed the crime of December 22, 2017, on the grounds that the 09:00 on December 22, 2017, at the same parking lot B of the building B in Ansan-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-si, C does not grant vehicle repair costs, thereby having the victim DD used to reduce the parts of the 2M vehicle in a 4 air injection, thereby getting off the 50,000 won of the repair cost, thereby getting off its utility.

2. On December 23, 2017, the Defendant committed the crime of December 23, 2017: (a) around 09:13, Dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong, and (b) caused the use of the Defendant to reduce the 50,000 won of the parts into four capital by reducing the amount of BMW passenger car owned by the victim D and then reducing the parts of the parts into four capital.

3. On December 29, 2017, the Defendant committed the crime of December 29, 2017, in the same parking lot B of the building B in Ansan-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong (hereinafter referred to as “victim”)

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a investigative report (Attachment of a estimate for the maintenance of a motor vehicle), a investigative report (Attachment of CCTV image images), a internal report (Attachment of On-site photographs), and a investigative report (related to ownership of damaged vehicles);

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment, and the choice of fine for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of the Provisional Payment Order, the Defendant has impaired the utility of the vehicle three times in such a way that the Defendant deducteds the air of the other language or locked it with the wheels.

The Defendant did not agree with the victim until now, and was punished for a fine for the same crime in 2014.

However, the defendant recognizes his mistake and is against his will.

The motive and circumstances of the defendant's crime may be considered.