logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.09.26 2013고단4546
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Around March 2010, the Defendant: (a) taken advantage of the fact that the Victim B, who was known to the Defendant, was aware of that he was preparing for the appointment of university professors, the Defendant called the victim by phoneing him to the victim, and called, “I want to find out the teaching place of his or her or her or her or her or her or her or her or her or her or her or her or her or her or her or her or her or her or her or her or her or her or her or her or her or her or her or her or she was a professor of the C University Life Science University through the Seongbuk-gu Coordination Office of the NIS; and (b) called, “The Seongbuk-gu Mediation Office of the National Assembly of Korea has called the victim to employ his or her or her or her her or her or her

However, as the defendant does not know who is the Seongbuk-gu Mediation Officer of the National Intelligence Service, he did not have the ability to appoint the victim's father as a university professor through that person, and even if he received money from the victim, he was thought to use the money for personal purposes such as living expenses.

Around July 10, 2010, the Defendant received KRW 10 million from the victim’s account in the name of a corporate bank account in the name of the Defendant’s child, under the above circumstances.

On November 2010, the Defendant continued to call again to the victim who was in the middle of the year 2010, and received five million won from the victim to the account in the name of one bank in the above D.

Accordingly, the defendant deceivings the victim as above, thereby deceiving 15 million won in total.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Part B of the interrogation protocol of the second police officer against the accused;

1. Application of the police protocol protocol law to B

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting the crime;

1. Criminal records and criminal records of suspended execution, which are committed against the defendant who choose a selective fine;

arrow