1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

On May 12, 2003, the Plaintiff sold a motor vehicle as indicated in the separate sheet to the Defendant on May 12, 2003, but the title of ownership was not yet transferred to the Defendant. Even if the Defendant did not purchase a motor vehicle as indicated in the separate sheet from the Plaintiff, it is the actual owner of the above motor vehicle since the Plaintiff was named in the name of the automobile insurance contract for the above motor vehicle from 2010 to 2010. Thus, it is argued that the Defendant would have applied for the procedure for ownership transfer registration as stated in the purport of the claim, and there is no evidence to acknowledge that the Plaintiff sold the motor vehicle as indicated in the separate sheet to the Defendant on May 12, 2003, and it is difficult to recognize that the motor vehicle as indicated in the separate sheet is owned by the Defendant, even if the Plaintiff is the title holder of the insurance contract, and

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.