1. The Defendant’s KRW 42,862,539 and KRW 42,602,454 among the Plaintiff’s KRW 42,862,539, annually, from July 17, 2008 to December 27, 2008.

1. The description of the grounds for claims and the attached Form of claims shall be as specified;

(However, the obligee’s “creditor” is deemed to be the Plaintiff, and the “debtor” is deemed to be the “Defendant”). The Seoul Western District Court Decision 2008Gadan95390 Decided February 3, 2009 and the interruption of extinctive prescription is demanded for the interruption of extinctive prescription.

2. Judgment to be rendered for the confession of applicable provisions of law (Article 208(3)2 of the Civil Procedure Act, and the defendant only submitted a formal written objection with the original of the payment order and the original of the payment order, and did not attend the court on the date of pleading without submitting any subsequent detailed written response. Thus, it is deemed that all the plaintiff's allegations have been led to confession under Article 1