beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The defendant is the husband of C, who is the nominal owner of B, 7,499/14,00 of the shares in land B at the time of Jeonyangyang-si, and is the actual owner of the said shares in land.
1. On December 1, 2009 or early January 2010, the Defendant, at a restaurant where it is impossible to know the trade name D located in Manyang-si, Manyang-si, the Defendant: “The Defendant would develop the land B as the site for the site; the construction cost for the development of the site for the site for the soil and stone coming from the above land would be sufficient while selling it, and later would be 200,000 won or more per square year if the above land is developed as the site for the site for the site. C’s purchase of the above land shares at KRW 14,499,49, 7,887, and KRW 4960,12,000,000,000 and payment of the purchase price would be completed by June 2010 and complete the development of the site for the site for the period of March 201.”
However, the defendant did not have the intent or ability to develop the above land into a factory site for the victims even if he received the above payment from the victims.
Nevertheless, the Defendant obtained the victim E from January 11, 201 to January 19, 2010, KRW 30 million over two occasions between the victim E and January 19, 201, and KRW 40 million over three occasions between January 8, 2010 and February 4, 2010.
2. On April 2013, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim E and F that “If the Defendant paid an additional amount of KRW 10 million,00,000,000 to the victim E and F in terms of the remainder of the purchase price of land B in lightyang-si G located in Gwangju-si and the development cost of the said land, the Defendant would necessarily develop the said land as a factory site until the Haman, 2014.”
However, the defendant did not have an intention or ability to develop the above land as a factory site even if he received the cost of developing the above land from the victim E as above.
Nevertheless, the defendant is above.