logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2019.07.04 2018고단6975
협박등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 00:40 on August 31, 2018, the Defendant: (a) posted the front door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door, door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door, and (b) threatened the victim even after the police officer was dispatched through a report by the said victim, the Defendant threatened

(A) The Defendant asserts that there is no fact that the Defendant expressed the victim’s desire to kill. The following witness’s testimony recognizes the fact that the Defendant told the victim that he would die. According to the witness’s testimony, it is difficult to say that such speech or behavior is merely merely an indication of a simple abusive or temporary pulse, taking into comprehensive account the circumstances leading up to the above act and surrounding circumstances, such as the background leading up to the act, the relationship with the victim, etc. at the time. The Defendant’s intent of intimidation or intimidation is recognized.

2. On August 31, 2018, at the same place as the preceding paragraph, at around 00:55, the Defendant: (a) committed an act of obstruction of performance of official duties; (b) in a manner that, at the same time as the foregoing D’s report, the Defendant, who received a request for confirmation of the contents of the report from G (33 years of age) a slope belonging to the Suwon-nam Police Station F District; and (c) expressed that “the Defendant shall be subject to the investigation at a disadvantage of the Defendant; and (d) expressed that “the bit of a bit of a bit of a bitch, bit of a bit of a bitch, bit of a bit of a bit of a bit

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of 112 reports by police officers and crime prevention.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness D and G;

1. Investigation report (related to cell phone images presented by police officers);

1. The report of internal history, the damaged part photograph, and the photograph;

arrow