A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

"2017 Highest 5590"

1. On July 26, 2017, the Defendant, on July 26, 2017, committed a theft with a 300 bicycle 10,000 won or less at the victim’s market price, where the F was installed without a locking device, using a cresh in around the 603 Dong-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu E apartment complex 603 13 east 13 east-gu, Daegu-gu, 201.

2. On September 17, 2017, the Defendant: (a) committed the crime, around 04:43 on September 17, 2017; (b) committed a theft with a CELO XC30 bicycle 1,200,000 won at the victim’s market price, which was installed by the victim G without any locking device, using a cresh in around 610-dong-gu, Daegu-gu E apartment building 610-dong, Daegu-gu, 4, and four floors; and (c) used a cresh in around 1.2 million won

3. On September 22, 2017, the Defendant: (a) committed around September 22, 2017, at the 503:00 Daegu Dong-gu H apartment building No. 503 Dong-gu 11th floor, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, about September 22, 2017; (b) used a cresh in the surrounding area where the victim I installed without any locking device; and (c) was stolen with one bicycle.

On September 14, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 2018, the new world department store located in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu; (b) reported and contacted the Defendant, even though he was a stolen bicycle, that he was selling the bicycles on the Internet Neber and the national site; (c) as if he was his own possession, the Defendant was able to do so, and (d) 100 bicycle riding 10,000 bicycle by receiving KRW 160,00 from the damaged person, i.e., from the damaged person.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

On November 12, 2017, the Defendant, on the 2017 Daegu Metropolitan City (Seoul Metropolitan City) (hereinafter referred to as the “S25 mobile merchandise coupons”), puts a letter on the Internet Neneber’s website (hereinafter referred to as the “S25 mobile merchandise coupons”) and sent a mobile merchandise coupon amounting to KRW 50,000 when remitting KRW 35,00 to the victim K.

“.......”

However, the defendant did not have the above merchandise coupons.