logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.11.27 2014고정1096
사문서위조등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Around December 2011, the Defendant: (a) had a lien against the Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D's D'; (b) upon the request of the E bank that caused damage to illegal loans; (c) filed a civil petition with the Financial Supervisory Service; (d) however, if the investigation agency of the same matter is under investigation by the Financial Supervisory Service, the civil petition received from the Financial Supervisory Service shall be suspended; and (c) without the consent of C to withdraw the accusation filed with the Seoul Central District Court on January 11, 2012;

1. On or around February 20, 2012, the number of the “case” under the title “written withdrawal of accusation” in A4 form in the Defendant’s dwelling at 514 of the Seoul Central District Court Decision 2012-253 (12 January 12, 2012), “C,” which is the accusation,” “Defendant”

1. Vice-President of the G E Bank2;

2. A person in charge of loan, “A person in charge of loan” and a person in charge of the case C withdraw the accusation of the instant case.

On 20 February 20, 2012, "C" written by the accusation, and then stamped the round seal, which was previously held by C, the name of C, thereby forging a copy of the withdrawal of the accusation in the name of C, which is a private document concerning the certification of facts, without authority, for the purpose of exercising the right;

2. On the same day, Jung-gu Seoul Central District Public Prosecutorial Office sent the withdrawal of the forged accusation by the post office 312-1 located in Dong-ro 4, Jung-gu, Seoul to the public prosecutorial office of the Seoul Central Public Prosecutorial Office by registered mail, and had the person in charge of the public prosecutorial office of the Seoul Central Public Prosecutorial Office who did not know the forged accusation receive the written withdrawal of the accusation as if it

Summary of Evidence

1. C’s legal statement;

1. C’s statement among the suspect interrogation protocol of the defendant against the defendant

1. Part concerning the statement C among the interrogation protocol of the second police officer about G

1. Each police statement of C;

1. Statement of accusation (No. 4 pages of investigation record);

1. A written withdrawal of a complaint, a written petition submitted by a complainant (in title 32, title 1 to investigation records), a civil petition application, and a written petition (3), ;

arrow