logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.07.05 2016가단5224933
보증채무금
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The allegations and judgment of the parties

A. The ground for the plaintiff's claim is stated in the annexed sheet of claim

(However, ‘creditor' is regarded as ‘Defendant'. (B) The creditor is regarded as ‘Defendant'.

Judgment

1) In the case of a juristic act to which an additional officer attached, if it is reasonable to deem that a failure to perform his/her obligation would occur if the facts indicated in an additional officer do not occur, it shall be deemed as a condition, and if it is reasonable to deem that a failure to perform his/her obligation not only when the indicated facts have occurred, but also when it becomes final and conclusive that no objection has occurred, it shall be deemed as having been determined by an indefinite period (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2013Da26128, Aug. 22, 2013). 2) The Defendant’s obligation to pay the respective letter of commitment alleged by the Plaintiff by the Plaintiff is established only when the management improvement of the corporation C and profits accrue (see, e.g., attached Form B)., the above additional officer should be deemed as a condition for suspension, not an indefinite period, and the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff cannot be deemed as having determined the contents of each of

3. However, the Plaintiff’s assertion cannot be accepted unless there is any evidence to prove that profits have been realized to C after the preparation of the instant statement.

2. Dismissal of the Plaintiff’s request

arrow