Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

around 15:00 on January 28, 2016, the Defendant appeared as a witness in the Busan District Court No. 351, which was located at the 31st court of the Busan District Court, and the above court 2015 and 4030, which was 4030.

The above case is a case in which B assaulted on one occasion from the packing horse operated by the defendant in the Busan Young-gu, Busan on May 10, 2015 at the time of the cream of D(20 years of age) and inflicted bodily injury upon E(28 years of age) at the time of multiple times.

In fact, since the defendant showed that B was at the time D and E, B was aware of the fact that B and D were at the time.

Nevertheless, the Defendant refers to 20 men and women who are 20 men and women, who are able to attend well, as stated in the Prosecutor’s “I am well.”

The phrase "in the newspaper of " does not seem to be a light at that time," and the fact that he/she became a son was a woman pet (E).

A man's (D) test is not limited, but a man's pety test is the same as a man's pety test. A man's pety test only is women's pety test, a man's pety test shows a man's pety test, and a man's pety test is not between a man's pety, but between a man's pety test and a man's pety test.

The testimony, "(when being investigated by the police)" is when the memory is specific to some extent, and at that time, the defendant was at the time when the defendant was 20 male test and boomed.

At this time, it is necessary to see that the defendant's questions are female customers.

Women's도요 in the newspaper of "......."

A man-competence test shall not be made in the male-competence test only in the female-competence test. The witness " gives testimony," in the police station, he was at the time of the defendant's bucket.

At this time, it is necessary to judge whether the defendant was at the time of female rather than 20 men.

The term "to answer". Women's Tyle.

The testimony was made.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Protocols concerning the interrogation of suspects of D;