Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a rocketing car.

On June 25, 2017, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at around 12:53 on June 25, 2017, while driving the road in front of the E pharmacy D at the same time, and parked on the road at the location of the accident.

In such cases, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents by accurately manipulating the steering gear and brakes, and by accurately manipulating the steering gear and brakes.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to park on the road and went up to the road by pushing ahead of the victim F (F, South, 65 years old) who is walking on the road with a view to avoiding the shock of this shock, and caused the victim F (F, South, and 61 years old), who is walking on the road, to go over the road, and shocked the victim's right side on the right side of the vehicle under the direction. The Defendant caused the victim F, by negligence on the part of the above duties, the Defendant caused the victim F, who is in need of approximately two weeks of medical treatment, to suffer injury, such as the dump, tension, and the dump of the shoulder, which requires approximately one week of medical treatment, and to G.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident, a survey report on actual condition, and a photograph related to accident;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3(1) and proviso of Article 3(2)9 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts (the Defendant did not have committed an offense against the sidewalk with a vehicle). Thus, the Defendant asserts that Article 3(1) and proviso of Article 3(2)9 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents are not applicable.

According to the records, in light of the fact that the Defendant was seriously damaged by the vehicle of this case due to shock of victims with the vehicle of this case, and the telegraph was located on the sidewalk, and the road stone of the part of the accident of this case was low so that the vehicle can enter the sidewalk, the Defendant was shocked by the vehicle of this case.

I think)

1. Commercial concurrence;