beta
Text
1. Of the instant lawsuit, the shareholders of each of the shares listed in the separate sheet between the Plaintiff and Defendant D are the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. The facts following the facts do not conflict between the parties, or can be acknowledged in full view of the purport of the whole pleadings in the entries in Gap evidence 1-1-2, Gap evidence 2-1-3, and evidence No. 5
(In fact, although the list of shareholders was not submitted, the defendants do not clearly dispute the change of the shareholder's name as stated in Gap's 2-1 to 3's statement on the change of the shareholder's name as stated in Gap's 2-1 to 3's statement on the change of stocks, etc., and therefore the defendant is deemed to have prepared the list of shareholders of the defendant company as stated in Gap's 2-1 to 3.
Defendant D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Co., Ltd.”) was established on May 4, 2009 as KRW 50,000,000 (the total number of KRW 10,000 per share) (the total number of KRW 5,000 per share) and at the time, the Plaintiff was registered as a shareholder of the Defendant Co., Ltd. with KRW 2,50 (51%) and KRW 225 (24.5%) respectively.
B. On February 9, 2011, the Plaintiff concluded a contract under which the shares of the Defendant Company were transferred to Defendant B in KRW 25,550,000 (hereinafter “instant transfer contract”).
C. As of the end of 2011, the Defendant Company entered F’s shares 1,225 shares in the name of the Plaintiff in the name of Defendant B, and entered F’s shares 1,225 shares in each of the G. As of the end of 2011, B,50 shares in the register of shareholders of the Defendant Company, E, and G as each shareholder of B,50 shares in the register of shareholders of the Defendant Company.
C. As of the end of 2012, the Defendant Company entered 975 shares out of 1,225 shares in G name, 975 shares out of 2,50 shares in Defendant B, Defendant C’s shareholder registry, respectively, as the end of 2012, the Plaintiff entered 975 shares, Defendant B’s 1,250 shares, E 1,225 shares, and Defendant C’s 1,300 shares, respectively, and thereafter there was no change in the shareholder registry.
Meanwhile, the Plaintiff was appointed as the representative director along with the establishment of the Defendant Company, but resigned on January 28, 201, and Defendant C was appointed as the representative director on the same day.
2. Of the instant lawsuit, against the Defendant Company.