logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.06.19 2013고단1979
사기
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment of one year and six months, and Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment of one year and eight months, respectively.

provided that this ruling has become final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The telephone financial fraud organization, in China, assumes the responsibility of a government agency in the face of a free phone to Korean domestic people, induces a victim to be printed out by a near-to-face cash withdrawal account, and then instructs the transfer of the victim to the so-called large-term bank account prepared in advance, takes part in the role of the Chinese local call "," "China's total liability" under the direction of the Chinese total book, "Korean total liability" under the direction of the Chinese book, "Korean total liability" under the order of the Chinese book to manage the organization of Korea and recruit the withdrawal remittance account, "passing the cash deposited in the passbook" under the direction of the Chinese total book, "passing the money deposited in the passbook" under the direction of the Chinese total book, "transfer account" under the transfer of cash withdrawn from Korea to China, and "passing account" under the direction of the Korean total book, and is operated in the form of a braille in preparation for arrest.

Defendant

B Pursuant to the direction of the general responsibility called “D office,” he conspireds to play the role of withdrawing and delivering the so-called “singishing,” the cash card under the name of another person from the delivery book of the passbook, such as E, by using it. Defendant A conspired to play the role of withdrawing and delivering the so-called “singishing,” by using the cash card under the name of another person from the delivery book, such as E, in accordance with the direction of the general responsibility called “F office”.

1. On March 26, 2013, Defendant B, who committed the fraud of the Chinese call center, concluded that “Around March 26, 2013, the victim H, who was in Bupyeong-gu, Incheon, Bupyeong-gu G apartment 108 Dong 1109, called Defendant B’s telephone, would be able to first pay the interest on one month which is not good credit rating and lend a loan if the surety insurance fee is paid.”

However, even if the money was received as interest or insurance premium, there was no intention to provide the victim with the loan.

A person who is not eligible for name shall be the victim by deceiving the victim and deceiving him.

arrow