logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2014.02.18 2013고단3113
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a ecoo vehicle in C.

1. Around 23:00 on October 8, 2013, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes) and the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes) and the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Road Traffic (U.S.) driving the said vehicle at the end of the traffic of Busan metropolitan traffic Daegu at the end of the traffic of the traffic of Busan, while driving the said vehicle at the end of the traffic of the second line in the direction of the traffic beach in the direction of the traffic beach, while driving the vehicle at the speed of the second line due to the influence of drinking, the Defendant’s negligence in the course of driving the vehicle at the right side of the said vehicle and resulting in the injury of the victim D and the victim F, who is the passenger, by taking approximately three weeks of the cost of repairing the said vehicle at the same time, and did not immediately flee and stop the vehicle without any necessary measure.

2. Around October 23, 2013, the Defendant was arrested at around 23:25 of the Road Traffic Act (refluence of the noise measurement) as described in paragraph (1) above on the road in front of the East Dokin’s Island located in the seat of Busan Metropolitan City Shipping Daegu.

At the time, the Defendant was required to comply with a drinking test by G in the circumstances belonging to the Busan Shipping Station, including a request from G in the Busan Shipping Station to respond to a drinking test, on 23:36 of the same day, 23:47 of the same day, and 23:59 on 4 occasions from the same day, but did not comply with a police officer’s request for a drinking test without good cause.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Report on the status of the driver;

1. Application of written estimates and written diagnosis to Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions concerning facts constituting an offense;

arrow