Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant exceeding the money ordered to be paid below shall be revoked.

In light of the above, it is difficult to readily conclude that allowing an assignment contract between the Plaintiff and C to proceed with litigation procedures, and the Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

4. Judgment on the merits

(a) Determination on the increase in construction cost (1) 1,840,80,000,000,000,0000,0000,0000,00000,0000,00000,00000,00000,00000,0000,00000,00000,00000,0000,00000,0000,0000,000000,000000,0000,00000,0000,0000,0000,0000,0000,00000,000,0000,0000,000,000,0000,000,0000,000,000,000,000,000,000.

(2) Although the Plaintiff did not include the details of the previous construction, the Plaintiff asserts that the construction cost should be additionally paid KRW 27,159,000, which is the above construction cost, as the Plaintiff added the construction of the parking lot and landscape green belt, cutting of ground, (2) excellent public works, sewage, and structure public works, and the construction of the structure public works, upon the request of the head of the Defendant’s site office, and that the Defendant, other than the Plaintiff, performed the cutting construction of the parking lot and landscape green belt, and that the excellent public works, sewage and structures are included in the subcontract construction contract with the Plaintiff, and thus, the additional construction cost cannot be recognized.

With respect to the filling-up and cutting-off of parking lots and landscape green belt zones, the plaintiff submitted.