logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2019.06.05 2018누70969
부당정직구제재심판정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff, including the part arising from the supplementary participation.

Reasons

If the facts of recognition stated in the grounds for the judgment of the court of first instance are compared and compared to the grounds for recognition, the fact-finding and the reasoning for the judgment of the court of first instance are all justified.

In addition to the evidence submitted by the court of first instance, it is possible to examine each of the evidence No. 13 and No. 16 of the witness Gap submitted by the plaintiff at the appellate court.

Accordingly, the reason for the judgment of the first instance is cited as the reason for this decision in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim should be dismissed due to the lack of reason.

The judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and thus, the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

arrow