The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The gist of the facts charged is that the Defendant is an engineer driving B-si, and the victim C (the remaining and the age of 22) is a passenger boarding the taxi.

On February 8, 2020, the Defendant, around 00:30, parked in the vicinity of the household distance adjacent to the building in Seo-gu Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon, and assaulted the victim by putting the head debt of the victim, who was frighted with the victim due to the problem of taxi charges and frighted with the victim, and frighted to the head of the fright.

2. The crime described in the facts charged of this case is a crime falling under Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim's express intent under Article 260 (3) of the Criminal Act. According to the records of this case, the victim expressed his/her intent not to prosecute the defendant after the prosecution of this case, "not to raise any civil objection again after the prosecution of this case," or the victim expressed his/her intent not to prosecute him/her unless the consent on this part is reflected. However, the person who expressed his/her intention not to punish the defendant cannot withdraw it at his/her discretion. Thus, the expression of intention cannot be acknowledged (Article 232 (3) and (2) of the Criminal Procedure Act). Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 (6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.