logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.08.22 2018고단2540
사문서위조등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for one year, and each of the defendants B shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

However, this decision is delivered to the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2018 High-class 2540" C is a person operating E, which is an importer or seller of eco-friendly foods, cosmetics, etc., established for the purpose of importing and selling business, such as eco-friendliness, bathing products, and cleaning goods, and Defendant A is a person who was entrusted with the affairs of the Internet homepage and logistics management, etc. of the Dispute Settlement Bank D from January 11, 2016 to May 27, 2016, and Defendant B is a person who was in charge of the affairs of the Dispute Settlement Bank D from December 16, 2015 to May 27, 2016, and Defendant B is a person who was in charge of the affairs of the Credit Settlement Bank D from December 16, 2015 to May 27, 2016.

1. The Defendants’ co-principals conspired to arbitrarily prepare a labor contract document and a certificate of employment, which are evidential documents, to receive the subsidy from Defendant B’s employment success in the employment certificate of the Ministry of Employment and Labor, with the aim of receiving the subsidy from Defendant B’s employment success in the process entrusted with the business affairs of the Seoul Regional Employment and Labor.

Defendant

A around April 11, 2016, at the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Office for the settlement of disputes, prepared and printed a written labor contract between the Fund for the settlement of disputes and the Defendant B using a computer in the office of the Fund for the settlement of disputes, and then sealed the employee identification number of the Fund for the settlement of disputes in the side portion printed as “A” (the date of preparation shall be February 20, 2016 in order to coincide with the date of employment report) of the Fund for the settlement of disputes, and prepared and printed a certificate of employment in the name of the Fund for the settlement of disputes by using a computer, and then forged the certificate of employment in the name of the Fund for the settlement of disputes: the name of the company; the representative; and the employee identification number of the Fund for the settlement of disputes in the name of the Fund for the settlement of disputes and the certificate of employment in the name of the Fund for the settlement of disputes and the certificate of employment by facsimile to the Seoul Local Employment Agency.

As a result, the defendants conspired to exercise their rights and duties, which is a private document D and a certificate of employment, were forged and used.

2. Defendant A.

arrow